Hackers Exploit Critical Xen Orchestra Auth Bypass Flaw to Gain Admin Access

Hackers Exploit Critical Xen Orchestra Auth Bypass Flaw to Gain Admin Access

Hackers Exploit Critical Xen Orchestra Auth Bypass Flaw to Gain Admin Access

Por Redação Security Technology•Nicho: cybersecurity, information security, hacking news and data breaches
* *Role:* Editor-in-Chief and senior cybersecurity analyst for "Security Technology". * *Mission:* Rewrite a short news snippet into a comprehensive, authoritative, in-depth cybersecurity analysis (1000-2000 words). * *Topic:* Xen Orchestra authentication bypass flaw (VSA-2026-062). * *Source Details:* Vates VMS warned of a critical vulnerability in Xen Orchestra. It's being actively exploited. No CVE yet, tracked as VSA-2026-062. Root cause: REST cookie parsing error where `authenticationToken=j:%7B%7D` turns into `{}`. * *Constraints:* * Length: 1000-2000 words. * Tone: Professional, authoritative, technical. * Format: HTML ONLY (no Markdown, no code fences). Use specific tags: `

`, `

`, `

`, ``, ``, `
    `, `
  • `, `
      `, `
      `, ``. * Structure: Executive Summary, Technical Analysis, Impact Assessment, Actionable Recommendations, Key Takeaways, Closing. * Keywords: vulnerability, data breach, ransomware, zero-day, cybersecurity, endpoint protection, threat intelligence, incident response, SIEM, SOC, penetration testing. * No Markdown, no code fences. * *What is Xen Orchestra?* It's the management interface for XenServer/XCP-ng. It's a critical piece of infrastructure for virtualization. * *The Vulnerability:* An authentication bypass via a malformed REST cookie. * *The Mechanism:* The parser takes a specific string (`j:%7B%7D`) and converts it into an empty JSON object (`{}`). If the backend logic checks for the *existence* of a token or a non-null object rather than a *valid* session/token, an empty object might bypass the check, granting administrative access. * *The Risk:* Full control over the virtualization layer. This means access to all VMs, their data, their networks, and the underlying host. This is a "holy grail" for attackers. * *Introduction/Executive Summary:* High-level view. Critical zero-day (effectively) in Xen Orchestra. Active exploitation. * *Technical Analysis:* * Identify the target: Xen Orchestra (management platform). * Identify the flaw: Authentication bypass in the REST API. * Mechanism: Cookie parsing logic error. Explain the `j:%7B%7D` to `{}` transformation. * Attack Vector: Unauthenticated network request to the REST endpoint. * MITRE ATT&CK: T1078 (Valid Accounts - though here it's bypassing the need for them), T1556 (Modify Authentication Process), T1068 (Exploitation for Privilege Escalation). * CVSS Estimation: Since it's an unauthenticated bypass to admin, it's likely 9.8 or 10.0. * *Impact Assessment:* * Virtualization layer compromise. * Lateral movement. * Ransomware deployment (encrypting VMs). * Data exfiltration (accessing VM disks). * Business continuity/Disaster recovery impact. * *Actionable Recommendations:* * Immediate patching (check Vates VMS advisories). * Network segmentation (isolate management interfaces). * Monitoring/Detection (SIEM/SOC rules for unusual REST API calls). * Incident Response (forensics on Xen Orchestra logs). * *Key Takeaways:* Bullet points. * *Closing:* The trend of attacking management planes. * *Expanding the Technical Section:* I need to talk about why parsing errors in REST APIs are common. I'll discuss the "Logic Flaw" vs. "Buffer Overflow" distinction. I'll explain how the `j:` prefix (likely a JWT-style or custom prefix) is being mishandled by the parser. * *Expanding the Impact Section:* I'll detail the "Blast Radius." If an attacker gets Xen Orchestra, they don't just get one server; they get the entire data center's compute resources. * *Expanding the Recommendations:* I'll add specific SIEM detection logic ideas (e.g., looking for the specific cookie pattern in web server logs). * *Self-Correction during drafting:* The prompt asks for 1000-2000 words. This is quite long for a single vulnerability report. I must ensure I don't just repeat myself. I will add sections on "The Evolution of Management Plane Attacks" and "Defense-in-Depth for Virtualization Infrastructure" to provide the "in-depth" value requested. * *Check Constraints:* * HTML only? Yes. * No Markdown? Yes. * No code fences? Yes. * Keywords included? Yes. * Structure followed? Yes. *(Self-Correction on Word Count Strategy)*: To hit the 1000+ mark, I will: 1. Elaborate on the importance of Xen Orchestra in the enterprise stack. 2. Provide a deep dive into the mechanics of RESTful authentication and how cookie-based session management works. 3. Discuss the implications of "Active Exploitation" (Zero-day context). 4. Detail the Incident Response lifecycle specifically for this type of breach. 5. Discuss the broader threat landscape of hypervisor management tools. * *Executive Summary:* 3 sentences. * *Technical Analysis:* * The Nature of the Vulnerability (VSA-2026-062). * Root Cause: The Cookie Parsing Logic Error. * The Attack Vector: Unauthenticated REST API manipulation. * MITRE ATT&CK Mapping. * *Impact Assessment:* * Total Infrastructure Compromise. * The Ransomware Vector. * Data Integrity and Exfiltration. * *The Management Plane: A High-Value Target:* (Contextual filler/depth). * *Actionable Recommendations:* * Immediate Remediation. * Detection and Monitoring (SIEM/SOC). * Hardening and Network Architecture. * *Key Takeaways:* List. * *Closing.* * *Keywords check:* vulnerability (yes), data breach (yes), ransomware (yes), zero-day (yes), cybersecurity (yes), endpoint protection (yes), threat intelligence (yes), incident response (yes), SIEM (yes), SOC (yes), penetration testing (yes). * *HTML Tag check:* `

      `, `

      `, `

      `, ``, ``, `
        `, `
      • `, `
          `, `
          `, ``. *(Note: I must ensure I don't use `##` or `**` anywhere. Everything must be pure HTML.)* *Drafting the content mentally...* "The vulnerability, tracked as VSA-2026-062, represents a critical failure in the authentication handshake..." "When the REST API receives the payload `authenticationToken=j:%7B%7D`, the parser incorrectly interprets the URL-encoded `{}` as a valid, albeit empty, JSON object..." "This is a classic logic flaw where 'presence' is equated with 'validity'..." *Wait, the word count requirement is high (1000-2000). I need to be very descriptive.* *Expanding Technical Analysis:* Discuss the difference between JWT (JSON Web Tokens) and how this specific implementation might be trying to mimic it, and how the parser fails to validate the signature or the content of the object. *Expanding Impact:* Discuss "Hypervisor Escape" vs "Management Plane Compromise." This isn't an escape; it's a takeover of the controller. *Expanding Recommendations:* Mention "Zero Trust" principles. *Final Review of HTML:* Ensure no `` or `` tags are needed, just the content as requested. The prompt says "Use ONLY semantic HTML tags". It doesn't explicitly say "Wrap in ", but usually, for a blog post, I provide the body content. I will provide the content starting from the first `

          `. *Final check on the "j:%7B%7D" part:* `%7B%7D` is `{}`. So `j:%7B%7D` becomes `j:{}`. The source says: "REST cookie parsing turns authenticationToken=j:%7B%7D into {}". This means the `j:` prefix is stripped or used as a marker, and the resulting `{}` is treated as a valid object by the subsequent authentication logic. *Let's go.*

Este conteúdo foi adaptado e enriquecido editorialmente pela equipe do Security Technology. Todos os direitos das informações originais pertencem aos seus respectivos autores.

SGLang RCE Exploit Breaches NEAR AI, Steals Data From 18 Agents and About 100 Users

SGLang RCE Exploit Breaches NEAR AI, Steals Data From 18 Agents and About 100 Users

SGLang RCE Exploit Breaches NEAR AI, Steals Data From 18 Agents and About 100 Users

Por Redação Security Technology•Nicho: cybersecurity, information security, hacking news and data breaches
* *Role:* Editor-in-Chief and senior cybersecurity analyst for "Security Technology". * *Mission:* Rewrite a brief news snippet into a comprehensive, authoritative, in-depth cybersecurity analysis (1000-2000 words). * *Original Content:* SGLang RCE exploit breaches NEAR AI, steals data from 18 agents and ~100 users. Attacker ran code on an inference server. Confidential mode (TEE) requests might have been exposed. * *Format:* HTML ONLY (no Markdown, no code fences). * *Structure:* Executive Summary, Technical Analysis, Impact Assessment, Actionable Recommendations, Key Takeaways, Closing. * *Tone:* Professional, authoritative, technical. * *Keywords:* vulnerability, data breach, ransomware, zero-day, cybersecurity, endpoint protection, threat intelligence, incident response, SIEM, SOC, penetration testing. * *Constraint Check:* 1000-2000 words (This is a significant expansion from the tiny source snippet). * *Subject:* SGLang (an open-source inference engine for LLMs). * *Vulnerability Type:* Remote Code Execution (RCE). * *Target:* NEAR AI inference servers. * *Impact:* Data theft (18 agents, 100 users), potential exposure of TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) confidential mode data. * *Inference Engine Context:* SGLang is used to speed up LLM serving. RCE in this context is critical because these servers handle highly sensitive prompts, weights, and user data. * *Introduction/Executive Summary:* Summarize the breach at NEAR AI via SGLang. * *Technical Analysis:* * What is SGLang? (Structured Generation Language). * How does RCE work in an inference engine? (Input sanitization failure, prompt injection leading to system command execution, or flaws in the runtime environment). * The TEE aspect: Why is it a big deal that even "confidential mode" was potentially compromised? (Memory scraping, side-channel, or kernel-level access). * MITRE ATT&CK mapping: T1190 (Exploit Public-Facing Application), T1059 (Command and Scripting Interpreter). * *Impact Assessment:* * Data leakage: User prompts, API keys, proprietary model weights, agentic workflows. * The "Agent" problem: If an agent's identity/credentials are stolen, the attacker can act on behalf of the user. * *Actionable Recommendations:* * Patching SGLang. * Network segmentation (isolating inference servers). * Monitoring (SIEM/SOC integration). * Hardening TEE implementations. * *Key Takeaways:* Bulleted summary. * *Self-Correction during drafting:* The source is very thin. To reach 1000+ words without fluff, I need to expand on the *architectural implications* of LLM inference security, the *nature of TEEs*, and the *risks of open-source dependencies* in the AI stack. *(Self-Correction on Word Count Strategy)*: 1. Discuss the rise of AI infrastructure attacks. 2. Deep dive into SGLang's role in the LLM ecosystem. 3. Explain RCE in the context of Python-based inference engines (common in AI). 4. Analyze the failure of TEEs in the face of OS-level RCE. 5. Discuss the "Agentic" era of AI and why agent compromise is a force multiplier for attackers. * *Executive Summary:* Focus on the NEAR AI incident and the SGLang vulnerability. * *Technical Analysis:* * Explain SGLang (Structured Generation Language) and its role in optimizing LLM throughput. * Discuss the mechanism of RCE: Likely via unsanitized input or a flaw in how the engine handles complex structured prompts. * Discuss the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) breach. Even if data is encrypted in memory, an RCE on the host OS allows an attacker to intercept data *before* it enters the TEE or *after* it leaves it, or potentially exploit the interface between the host and the enclave. * Mention CVSS (hypothetically high, e.g., 9.8) and MITRE ATT&CK (T1190, T1068). * *Impact Assessment:* * Data breach of 100 users and 18 agents. * The danger of "Agentic AI": Agents have permissions. If an agent is compromised, the attacker has the agent's "hands." * Loss of intellectual property (model weights/prompts). * *Actionable Recommendations:* * Immediate patching. * Implementing Zero Trust for inference endpoints. * Enhanced logging/SIEM. * Sandboxing inference processes. * HTML only? Yes. * No Markdown? Yes. * No code fences? Yes. * Semantic tags? Yes. * 1000-2000 words? I will ensure the depth is there. * Keywords included? Yes. *(Drafting the content - mental outline of sections)* - Intro: The new frontier of cyber warfare: AI Infrastructure. - The Incident: NEAR AI and SGLang. - Deep Dive: The SGLang Vulnerability. - The TEE Paradox: Why hardware security isn't a silver bullet. - The Agentic Risk: Why 18 agents matter more than 100 users. - Remediation. - Conclusion. *Note on word count:* To ensure I hit the target, I will elaborate on the "Inference-as-a-Service" (IaaS) model and the supply chain risks inherent in using open-source libraries like SGLang. * *Keywords to weave in:* vulnerability, data breach, zero-day, cybersecurity, endpoint protection, threat intelligence, incident response, SIEM, SOC, penetration testing. * *Structure:*

Executive Summary

The SGLang Vulnerability: A Deep Dive into Inference Engine Exploitation

The TEE Compromise: When Hardware Isolation Fails

The Agentic Threat: Escalating Impact via Autonomous Agents

Impact Assessment: Beyond Simple Data Exfiltration

Actionable Recommendations for AI Infrastructure Security

Key Takeaways

* Ensure no `**` or `###`. * Ensure only `

`, `

`, `

`, ``, ``, `
    `, `
  • `, `
      `, `
      `, ``. *(Self-Correction on TEE explanation)*: I must explain that RCE on the host allows an attacker to potentially bypass TEE protections by intercepting data at the application layer or via kernel-level manipulation, rendering the "confidential" mode moot if the orchestration layer is compromised. *(Self-Correction on SGLang)*: SGLang is a high-performance serving framework. An RCE here means the attacker isn't just getting a shell; they are getting access to the GPU memory, the model weights, and the entire request/response pipeline. * *Check:* Did I include "read more" or "subscribe"? No. * *Check:* Is the tone right? Yes, authoritative. * *Check:* Is it HTML only? Yes. *(Proceeding to generate HTML)*

Este conteúdo foi adaptado e enriquecido editorialmente pela equipe do Security Technology. Todos os direitos das informações originais pertencem aos seus respectivos autores.

Git Patches Flaw That Lets Malicious Repositories Execute Code During Recursive Clones

Git Patches Flaw That Lets Malicious Repositories Execute Code During Recursive Clones

Git Patches Flaw That Lets Malicious Repositories Execute Code During Recursive Clones

Por Redação Security Technology•Nicho: cybersecurity, information security, hacking news and data breaches
Critical Git Vulnerability (CVE-2026-111760) Exposes Developers to Remote Code Execution via Malicious Repositories

As Editor-in-Chief at "Security Technology," my role is to bring you incisive, actionable intelligence on the most pressing cybersecurity threats. Today, we delve into a critical vulnerability in Git, the ubiquitous version control system, that poses a significant risk of remote code execution (RCE) to developers, CI/CD pipelines, and any system interacting with potentially malicious repositories.

The discovery and subsequent patching of this flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-111760, underscore the persistent challenges in securing core development infrastructure against sophisticated supply chain attacks. This isn't merely a theoretical exploit; it's a vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on a victim's machine simply by having them perform a recursive clone of a specially crafted repository.

Executive Summary: Remote Code Execution via Git Recursive Clones

A severe integer truncation vulnerability (CVE-2026-111760) in Git's handling of its index allows for remote code execution (RCE) on systems that perform recursive clones of malicious repositories, including their submodules. This flaw enables an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code during the cloning process itself, bypassing traditional security controls and posing a significant supply chain risk to development environments and CI/CD pipelines. Immediate patching to Git versions 2.56.1 or specific backported releases is imperative.

Technical Analysis: Unpacking CVE-2026-111760 and the Integer Truncation Flaw

The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2026-111760, resides within Git's core functionality related to how it processes and manages its index. Specifically, the root cause has been identified as an integer truncation error. While a specific CVSS score has not been widely published at the time of this analysis, the potential for remote code execution during a routine development operation places this vulnerability firmly in the critical severity category, likely warranting a CVSS score of 9.0 or higher.

Understanding Integer Truncation in Git's Index

Git's index, often referred to as the "staging area," is a crucial component that acts as a buffer between the working directory and the repository's history. It's a binary file (typically .git/index) that stores information about the files Git is tracking, including their paths, modes, and object hashes. When Git processes this index, it performs various calculations, often involving lengths, offsets, and memory allocations based on the size of data it expects to handle.

An integer truncation vulnerability occurs when a program attempts to store a value in an integer type that is too small to hold it. When the larger value is "truncated" to fit the smaller type, its most significant bits are discarded, resulting in a completely different, often much smaller, value. In the context of CVE-2026-111760, this likely manifests in one of several ways:

  • Incorrect Memory Allocation: If Git calculates the size needed for a buffer based on a truncated length, it might allocate a buffer that is too small. Subsequent operations attempting to write data into this undersized buffer would then result in a heap-based buffer overflow.
  • Out-of-Bounds Access: Truncated offsets or indices could cause Git to read from or write to memory locations outside the intended boundaries of an array or allocated block.
  • Malformed Data Interpretation: A truncated value might lead Git's internal logic to misinterpret the structure or content of the index, potentially triggering unexpected code paths or data processing routines that an attacker could leverage.

For an attacker to exploit this, they would need to craft a malicious repository containing specific, carefully constructed data within its structure – likely within the submodule definitions or the index entries themselves – that, when processed by a vulnerable Git client, triggers this integer truncation. This could involve excessively long file paths, specially encoded characters, or manipulated metadata fields designed to overflow a specific integer type during parsing.

The Attack Vector: Recursive Clones and Submodules

The critical aspect of this vulnerability is its activation during a "recursive clone" operation. Git submodules allow a repository to embed other Git repositories as subdirectories. When a user performs git clone --recursive, Git not only clones the main repository but also initializes and updates all its submodules. This process involves Git actively parsing and processing the metadata of these submodules, including their respective .git/index files or related configuration.

This means the malicious code execution occurs *during* the clone operation itself, before the user has even opened any files from the repository. The attack flow would typically be:

  1. An attacker crafts a repository containing a submodule designed to trigger the integer truncation flaw.
  2. The attacker hosts this repository on a platform (e.g., GitHub, GitLab, a private Git server) or distributes it via phishing.
  3. A developer or automated system (like a CI/CD runner) performs git clone --recursive <malicious_repo_url>.
  4. During the processing of the submodule's metadata and index, the integer truncation occurs, leading to a memory corruption vulnerability.
  5. The attacker's carefully crafted payload, embedded within the malicious repository's structure, is then executed on the victim's machine.

This "drive-by" style execution is particularly dangerous as it leverages a trusted development tool and a common operation, making it difficult for users to detect or prevent without specific patches.

Affected Versions and Patches

The vulnerability affects a wide range of Git versions. The Git project has released patches to address CVE-2026-111760:

  • Primary Fix: Git 2.56.1
  • Backported Fixes:
    • Git 2.50.2 (for the 2.50 series)
    • Git 2.51.3 (for the 2.51 series)
    • Git 2.52.1 (for the 2.52 series)
    • Git 2.53.1 (for the 2.53 series)
    • Git 2.54.1 (for the 2.54 series)
    • Git 2.55.1 (for the 2.55 series)

Organizations and individual developers must identify their currently installed Git versions and prioritize upgrading to the patched releases immediately.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

This vulnerability maps to several MITRE ATT&CK techniques, highlighting its potential for initial access and execution:

  • Initial Access (TA0001):
    • T1199: Trusted Relationship: The attacker leverages the inherent trust developers place in source code repositories and the Git ecosystem. By hosting a malicious repository, they establish a "trusted" vector for initial compromise.
  • Execution (TA0002):
    • T1203: Exploitation for Client Execution: The core of the attack. The vulnerability in the Git client is exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution on the victim's machine.
    • T1059: Command and Scripting Interpreter: The payload executed by the vulnerability will likely leverage a command and scripting interpreter (e.g., Bash, PowerShell) to perform further actions, such as downloading additional malware, establishing persistence, or exfiltrating data.

Impact Assessment: Who is at Risk and What are the Consequences?

The implications of CVE-2026-111760 are severe and far-reaching, impacting a broad spectrum of individuals and organizations within the software development lifecycle.

Who is Affected?

  • Developers: Any developer who clones repositories, especially those using submodules, is directly at risk. This includes personal workstations, virtual development environments, and cloud-based development instances.
  • CI/CD Pipelines: Automated build and deployment systems that routinely clone repositories with submodules are highly vulnerable. Compromise of a CI/CD runner can lead to poisoned artifacts, supply chain attacks, and widespread compromise of downstream systems.
  • Open Source Contributors: Individuals contributing to open-source projects might clone forks or branches from untrusted sources, unknowingly exposing themselves.
  • Organizations with Internal Git Servers: While internal servers might seem safer, a compromised developer workstation could push malicious code, or an attacker with initial access could plant a malicious repository internally.

What Data is at Risk?

Successful exploitation can lead to a complete compromise of the affected system, putting various sensitive assets at risk:

  • Source Code and Intellectual Property: The primary target for many attackers, leading to theft of proprietary algorithms, designs, and trade secrets.
  • Credentials and API Keys: Developer workstations and CI/CD environments often store sensitive credentials for cloud services, internal systems, and third-party APIs. These can be exfiltrated and used for lateral movement or further attacks.
  • Sensitive Data: Any sensitive data stored on the compromised machine, including personal information, customer data, or internal documents, is at risk of exfiltration or encryption by ransomware.
  • Build Artifacts: In CI/CD environments, attackers could inject malicious code into compiled binaries or packages, leading to a supply chain attack that compromises all users of the affected software.

Business and Operational Consequences

The business and operational fallout from an RCE vulnerability of this magnitude can be catastrophic:

  • Supply Chain Compromise: This is the most significant risk. Malicious code injected into software at the build stage can propagate to customers, leading to widespread data breaches, reputational damage, and significant financial losses.
  • Ransomware Attacks: Compromised developer machines or build servers are prime targets for ransomware, disrupting operations and potentially leading to data loss.
  • Intellectual Property Theft: Loss of proprietary source code can severely impact a company's competitive advantage and future innovation.
  • Operational Disruption: Investigating and remediating such an incident requires significant resources, halting development efforts and impacting productivity.
  • Reputational Damage: A public data breach or supply chain attack can severely erode customer trust and brand reputation.
  • Compliance and Regulatory Penalties: Failure to protect sensitive data due to a preventable vulnerability can lead to hefty fines under regulations like GDPR, CCPA, or industry-specific mandates.

The stealthy nature of this attack, occurring during a seemingly innocuous git clone command, makes it particularly insidious. It bypasses traditional endpoint protection that might only scan files once they are written to disk or executed by a user, as the malicious code executes as part of the Git process itself.

Actionable Recommendations: Securing Your Git Workflow

Given the critical nature of CVE-2026-111760, immediate and decisive action is required. Organizations and individual developers must prioritize these steps to mitigate risk:

  1. Patch Git Immediately:
    • Upgrade all Git installations to version 2.56.1 or the corresponding patched version for your specific series (2.50.2, 2.51.3, 2.52.1, 2.53.1, 2.54.1, 2.55.1).
    • Ensure all development workstations, build servers, CI/CD runners, and automated scripts using Git are updated. This is the single most critical step.
  2. Audit Git Usage and Submodule Practices:
    • Review all instances where git clone --recursive is used, especially in automated scripts or CI/CD pipelines.
    • Identify all repositories that utilize submodules. Understand their origins and ensure they are from trusted sources.
    • Consider disabling automatic submodule updates (e.g., avoid --recursive by default) and instead explicitly initialize and update submodules only after verifying the main repository.
  3. Implement Strict Source Control Policies:
    • Enforce code review for all changes, especially those introducing or modifying submodule references.
    • Limit who can push to critical branches and repositories.
    • Utilize signed commits and tags to verify the authenticity of code origins.
  4. Enhance Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR):
    • Ensure EDR solutions are deployed on all developer workstations and build servers.
    • Configure EDR to monitor for suspicious process execution originating from Git processes, unusual network connections, or file modifications in sensitive directories (e.g., .git/ directories) during clone operations.
    • Look for execution of unexpected binaries or scripts by the Git process itself.
  5. Network Segmentation and Least Privilege for CI/CD:
    • Isolate CI/CD runners in segmented network environments with minimal outbound access.
    • Apply the principle of least privilege to CI/CD accounts and processes, ensuring they only have access to resources absolutely necessary for their function.
    • Consider ephemeral CI/CD environments that are destroyed after each build.
  6. Developer Security Awareness Training:
    • Educate developers about the risks of cloning untrusted repositories, even seemingly innocuous ones.
    • Emphasize the importance of verifying repository sources and understanding the implications of recursive clones.
  7. Integrate Threat Intelligence:
    • Subscribe to reputable threat intelligence feeds to stay informed about new vulnerabilities and active exploits.
    • Monitor for indicators of compromise (IOCs) related to Git vulnerabilities.
  8. Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing:
    • Conduct regular security audits of your development infrastructure and Git configurations.
    • Perform penetration testing that includes scenarios targeting developer workstations and CI/CD pipelines.
  9. Consider Alternative Source Control Solutions for Highly Sensitive Projects:
    • While Git is dominant, for projects with extreme security requirements, evaluate other version control systems or specialized secure development environments.

Key Takeaways: A Summary for Security Professionals

  • Critical RCE Vulnerability: CVE-2026-111760 allows remote code execution in Git clients.
  • Attack Vector: Exploited via integer truncation during recursive clones of malicious repositories with submodules.
  • High Impact: Poses significant risk of supply chain attacks, intellectual property theft, ransomware, and data breaches on developer workstations and CI/CD systems.
  • Immediate Patching Required: Upgrade to Git 2.56.1 or specific backported versions (2.50.2, 2.51.3, 2.52.1, 2.53.1, 2.54.1, 2.55.1).
  • Beyond Patching: Implement robust security hygiene for Git workflows, including source validation, EDR, network segmentation, and developer training.
  • Supply Chain Risk: This vulnerability highlights the critical need for vigilance in securing the software supply chain from its earliest stages.

The discovery of CVE-2026-111760 serves as a stark reminder that even foundational tools like Git are not immune to critical vulnerabilities. In an era where software supply chain attacks are increasingly prevalent, securing every link in the development chain is paramount. Proactive patching, rigorous security practices, and continuous vigilance are not just best practices; they are essential for survival in the evolving cybersecurity landscape. Stay updated, stay secure, and keep monitoring your environments for any signs of compromise.

Este conteúdo foi adaptado e enriquecido editorialmente pela equipe do Security Technology. Todos os direitos das informações originais pertencem aos seus respectivos autores.

Hackers Use LinkedIn Messages to Spread RAT Malware Through DLL Sideloading



Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a new phishing campaign that exploits social media private messages to propagate malicious payloads, likely with the intent to deploy a remote access trojan (RAT).
The activity delivers "weaponized files via Dynamic Link Library (DLL) sideloading, combined with a legitimate, open-source Python pen-testing script," ReliaQuest said in a report shared with


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Three Flaws in Anthropic MCP Git Server Enable File Access and Code Execution



A set of three security vulnerabilities has been disclosed in mcp-server-git, the official Git Model Context Protocol (MCP) server maintained by Anthropic, that could be exploited to read or delete arbitrary files and execute code under certain conditions.
"These flaws can be exploited through prompt injection, meaning an attacker who can influence what an AI assistant reads (a malicious README,


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

#72 - Quando a Técnica Vira Negócio: Empreendedorismo e Mitigação de DDoS com Daniel Damito

Neste episódio do Camada 8, conversamos com Daniel Damito, CEO e fundador da Sage Networks. Daniel falou sobre sua carreira, sua participação na comunidade técnica e como foi a sua trajetória no empreendedorismo, criando uma empresa com foco em mitigação de ataques DDoS. 
Além disso, também foram discutidos temas relevantes como tendências tecnológicas, incluindo o uso de Inteligência Artificial no combate a ataques DDoS, o futuro da segurança de redes e dicas para quem quer empreender na área.
Dê o play e confira agora mesmo o novo episódio do quadro Fluxo Empreendedor do Camada 8!


#FluxoEmpreendedor #Empreendedorismo #DDoS #MitigacaoDDoS


Participantes:

Antonio Marcos Moreiras (Host) - Gerente de projetos e desenvolvimento no NIC.br
https://www.linkedin.com/in/moreiras 

Eduardo Barasal Morales (Host) - Coordenador da área de formação de sistemas autônomos do Ceptro.br no NIC.br ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/eduardo-barasal-morales⁠

Daniel Damito (Convidado) - CEO na Sage Networks

⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-damito/


Links citados:

Semana de Infraestrutura da Internet no Brasil: ⁠https://semanainfra.nic.br/⁠

Agenda de cursos do Ceptro|NIC.br: ⁠https://ceptro.br/cursos-eventos⁠


Redes Sociais:

⁠https://www.youtube.com/nicbrvideos/⁠

⁠https://x.com/comuNICbr/⁠

⁠https://www.telegram.me/nicbr/⁠

⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/nic-br/⁠

⁠https://www.instagram.com/nicbr/⁠

⁠https://www.facebook.com/nic.br/⁠

⁠https://www.flickr.com/NICbr/⁠


Contato:

Equipe Ceptro.br

cursosceptro@nic.br


Direção e áudio:

Equipe Ceptro.br

Equipe de Comunicação do NIC.br


Edição completa por Rádiofobia Podcast e Multimídia: ⁠https://radiofobia.com.br/⁠


Veja também:

⁠https://nic.br/⁠

⁠https://ceptro.br/





Fonte: Leia a matéria original

ATUALIZAÇÃO: Horário do incidente: 20 de jan. de 2026, 11:32 UTC

O incidente começou em 2026-01-20 11:32 Os horários estão listados no fuso horário UTC.

Há mais um texto disponível em inglês. Acesse a página nesse idioma para conferir.


Produtos afetados: Admin Console




Fonte: Leia a matéria original

ATUALIZAÇÃO: Horário do incidente: 20 de jan. de 2026, 11:32 UTC

O incidente começou em 2026-01-20 11:32 Os horários estão listados no fuso horário UTC.

Há mais um texto disponível em inglês. Acesse a página nesse idioma para conferir.


Produtos afetados: Admin Console




Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Featured Chrome Browser Extension Caught Intercepting Millions of Users' AI Chats



A Google Chrome extension with a "Featured" badge and six million users has been observed silently gathering every prompt entered by users into artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots like OpenAI ChatGPT, Anthropic Claude, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, xAI Grok, Meta AI, and Perplexity.
The extension in question is Urban VPN Proxy, which has a 4.7 rating on the Google Chrome


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

How Tech’s Biggest Companies Are Offloading the Risks of the A.I. Boom



The data centers used for work on artificial intelligence can cost tens of billions to build. Tech giants are finding ways to avoid being on the hook for some of those costs.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Roomba Maker iRobot Files for Bankruptcy, With Chinese Supplier Taking Control



Founded in 1990 by three M.I.T. researchers, iRobot introduced its vacuum in 2002. Its restructuring will turn the company over to its largest creditor.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

FreePBX Patches Critical SQLi, File-Upload, and AUTHTYPE Bypass Flaws Enabling RCE



Multiple security vulnerabilities have been disclosed in the open-source private branch exchange (PBX) platform FreePBX, including a critical flaw that could result in an authentication bypass under certain configurations.
The shortcomings, discovered by Horizon3.ai and reported to the project maintainers on September 15, 2025, are listed below -

CVE-2025-61675 (CVSS score: 8.6) - Numerous


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

⚡ Weekly Recap: Apple 0-Days, WinRAR Exploit, LastPass Fines, .NET RCE, OAuth Scams & More



If you use a smartphone, browse the web, or unzip files on your computer, you are in the crosshairs this week. Hackers are currently exploiting critical flaws in the daily software we all rely on—and in some cases, they started attacking before a fix was even ready.
Below, we list the urgent updates you need to install right now to stop these active threats.
⚡ Threat of the Week
Apple and


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Trump Moves to Stop States From Regulating AI With a New Executive Order



The order would create one federal regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, President Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

China Is Getting Much of What It Wants From the U.S., Including Chips



For China, President Trump’s moves to loosen chip controls, soften U.S. rhetoric and stay silent on tensions with Japan amount to a rare string of strategic gains.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Harold Hamm, Oklahoma Oil Tycoon, Allies With Trump to Reshape U.S. Energy



Harold Hamm, an Oklahoma oil tycoon, has played a central role in reshaping energy policy by allying himself with President Trump.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Can OpenAI Respond After Google Closes the A.I. Technology Gap?



A new technology release from OpenAI is supposed to top what Google recently produced. It also shows OpenAI is engaged in a new and more difficult competition.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Celular Seguro vai bloquear aparelhos que não têm o app instalado

Nesta quinta-feira (11), o secretário-executivo do Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública (MJSP), Manoel Carlos de Almeida Neto, anunciou que o sistema Celular Seguro pode, agora, bloquear qualquer celular, mesmo que o aparelho não possua o aplicativo instalado.

Informação de roubo/furto dispensa cadastro

  • A novidade funciona sem a necessidade de informar o IMEI do aparelho;
  • Agora, caso o cidadão tiver um dispositivo roubado ou furtado, basta acessar o sistema de qualquer outro aparelho, em até 15 dias após o fato, e inserir os seguintes dados:
    • Data e hora do acontecido;
    • Linha telefônica usada no smartphone.
  • Contudo, apenas o titular da linha telefônica inserida pode realizar o bloqueio;
  • O processo todo, agora, pode ser realizado mesmo por pessoas que não se cadastraram no Celular Seguro.

Montagem de celular com aplicativo Celular Seguro aberto
Agora, sistema pode ser acessado por qualquer pessoa, mesmo sem cadastro (Imagem: Divulgação)

“É o Celular Seguro para todos. Mesmo sem estar cadastrado, o cidadão que for vítima de furto ou roubo, pode entrar no Celular Seguro por outro aparelho, por um tablet, por exemplo, baixar o aplicativo e fazer o seu registro”, frisou Neto.

“Com isso, ele vai poder bloquear a linha telefônica, os aplicativos financeiros, o IMEI do aparelho ou cadastrar no modo recuperação”, prosseguiu. “Portanto, o Celular Seguro não está apenas disponível para esses 3,6 milhões de cadastrados e, sim, para todos os brasileiros” finalizou.

Leia mais:

Homem roubando celular de bolsa de mulher
Notificação pode ser realizada até 15 dias após o acontecido (Imagem: DedMityay/Shutterstock)

O que é o Celular Seguro?

  • Desde que foi lançada, a iniciativa conta com cerca de 3,6 milhões de usuários;
  • O programa funciona como um botão de emergência que aciona a Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (Anatel), as operadoras de telefonia e os bancos, de forma rápida, para impedir que os bandidos tenham acesso aos dados do aparelho;
  • Quem se cadastra pode indicar pessoas de sua confiança, que estarão autorizadas a efetuar os bloqueios, caso o titular tenha o celular roubado, furtado ou extraviado;
  • É possível cadastrar quantos números quiser no app, mas eles precisam estar vinculados ao CPF do titular da linha para que o bloqueio seja efetivado;
  • Após o registro da ocorrência relacionada ao aparelho, bancos e instituições financeiras que aderiram ao projeto bloquearão suas contas;
  • Mas, atenção: não é possível desbloquear o aparelho por meio da ferramenta;
  • Assim, caso você emita um alerta de perda, furto ou roubo, mas recupere o telefone em seguida, terá que solicitar os acessos entrando em contato com a operadora e os bancos, entre outros.

Foto tirada pela polícia de apreensão de celulares roubados e furtados
Aparelhos cadastrados como produtos de roubo/furto/extravio no Celular Seguro deve ser entregue à polícia, caso o dono receba a mensagem que confirma isso e não tenha nota fiscal (Imagem: Agepen)

Desde abril, o serviço “dedura” aparelhos roubados ao enviar mensagens para esses aparelhos, mesmo que a linha telefônica instalada seja outra. Caso a pessoa recebeu a mensagem, pode ter comprado produto fruto de roubo/furto/extravio.

A mensagem alerta para a condição do aparelho e pede que o cidadão acesse o Celular Seguro para orientações sobre o que fazer. Nesse caso, a pessoa deve se apresentar à delegacia mais próxima com o dispositivo e com a nota fiscal dele, caso possua. Do contrário, será necessário entregá-lo à polícia.

Há, ainda, a possibilidade de consultar no sistema se o aparelho em mãos foi cadastrado no Celular Seguro.

O post Celular Seguro vai bloquear aparelhos que não têm o app instalado apareceu primeiro em Olhar Digital.




Fonte: Leia a matéria original

IA vence humanos em teste de hacking e acende alerta global

Após anos de tentativas pouco eficazes, ferramentas de inteligência artificial voltadas ao hacking finalmente atingiram um nível perigoso de eficiência — a ponto de superar profissionais humanos. As informações são do Wall Street Journal.

A constatação veio de um experimento da Universidade Stanford, que desenvolveu o bot Artemis, treinado para escanear redes, identificar vulnerabilidades e encontrar formas de explorá-las.

Ferramentas de IA para invasão deixam de ser promessa e viram ameaça real (Imagem: SergeyBitos/Shutterstock)

IA foi melhor que humanos em testes

  • Inspirado em técnicas usadas por grupos chineses que recorreram a modelos generativos para invadir governos e grandes empresas, o Artemis foi testado em uma rede real: a infraestrutura de engenharia da própria Stanford.
  • Para avaliar seu desempenho, os pesquisadores colocaram a IA frente a frente com dez testadores de penetração profissionais.
  • O resultado surpreendeu: o Artemis superou nove deles, encontrando bugs com velocidade e a um custo significativamente menor — cerca de US$ 60 por hora, contra diárias humanas que variam entre US$ 2.000 e US$ 2.500.

Leia mais:

Big Data e IA
IA atinge nível profissional no hacking e preocupa especialistas (Imagem: frank60/Shutterstock)

Riscos imediatos e impacto no ecossistema de segurança

Apesar do desempenho, a IA apresentou falhas: 18% dos relatórios eram falsos positivos e um erro básico passou despercebido. Ainda assim, para especialistas de Stanford, o experimento reforça a utilidade dessas ferramentas, sobretudo diante do volume de código global sem testes de segurança adequados.

Mas o avanço rápido também acende alertas. Pesquisas recentes da Anthropic apontam que agentes maliciosos já usam modelos de IA para ampliar ataques em larga escala.

Desenvolvedores de softwares de código aberto, como o Curl, relatam uma enxurrada de relatórios gerados por IA — muitos inúteis, alguns surpreendentemente precisos.

Em Stanford, o Artemis inclusive encontrou um bug que humanos não detectaram, justamente analisando páginas que navegadores atuais não conseguiam ler.

A nova geração de IAs promete ampliar a proteção digital — e, ao mesmo tempo, os riscos.

Ataque hacker
Com desempenho superior ao de profissionais, Artemis representa salto tecnológico — e um desafio urgente para empresas e governos (Imagem: shutterstock/supimol kumying)

O post IA vence humanos em teste de hacking e acende alerta global apareceu primeiro em Olhar Digital.




Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Doxers Posing as Cops Are Tricking Big Tech Firms Into Sharing People’s Private Data



A spoofed email address and an easily faked document is all it takes for major tech companies to hand over your most personal information.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

React2Shell Exploitation Delivers Crypto Miners and New Malware Across Multiple Sectors



React2Shell continues to witness heavy exploitation, with threat actors leveraging the maximum-severity security flaw in React Server Components (RSC) to deliver cryptocurrency miners and an array of previously undocumented malware families, according to new findings from Huntress.
This includes a Linux backdoor called PeerBlight, a reverse proxy tunnel named CowTunnel, and a Go-based


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

The Impact of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) on Identity and Access Management



As enterprises refine their strategies for handling Non-Human Identities (NHIs), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) has become a powerful tool for streamlining operations and enhancing security. However, since RPA bots have varying levels of access to sensitive information, enterprises must be prepared to mitigate a variety of challenges. In large organizations, bots are starting to outnumber


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

CISA Flags Actively Exploited GeoServer XXE Flaw in Updated KEV Catalog



The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Thursday added a high-severity security flaw impacting OSGeo GeoServer to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, based on evidence of active exploitation in the wild.
The vulnerability in question is CVE-2025-58360 (CVSS score: 8.2), an unauthenticated XML External Entity (XXE) flaw that affects all versions prior to


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

React2Shell Exploitation Escalates into Large-Scale Global Attacks, Forcing Emergency Mitigation



The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has urged federal agencies to patch the recent React2Shell vulnerability by December 12, 2025, amid reports of widespread exploitation.
The critical vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-55182 (CVSS score: 10.0), affects the React Server Components (RSC) Flight protocol. The underlying cause of the issue is an unsafe deserialization


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

New React RSC Vulnerabilities Enable DoS and Source Code Exposure



The React team has released fixes for two new types of flaws in React Server Components (RSC) that, if successfully exploited, could result in denial-of-service (DoS) or source code exposure.
The team said the issues were found by the security community while attempting to exploit the patches released for CVE-2025-55182 (CVSS score: 10.0), a critical bug in RSC that has since been weaponized in


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

New Advanced Phishing Kits Use AI and MFA Bypass Tactics to Steal Credentials at Scale



Cybersecurity researchers have documented four new phishing kits named BlackForce, GhostFrame, InboxPrime AI, and Spiderman that are capable of facilitating credential theft at scale.
BlackForce, first detected in August 2025, is designed to steal credentials and perform Man-in-the-Browser (MitB) attacks to capture one-time passwords (OTPs) and bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA). The kit


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Atenção, usuários de Mac! Novo golpe começa com uma simples busca no Google

De acordo com dados de um relatório recente da Huntress, empresa especializada em detecção e resposta a ameaças, há um novo método de ataque voltado a donos de computadores Mac, no qual criminosos conseguem levar usuários a copiar e colar um comando no Terminal do macOS que, em vez de liberar espaço no disco, instala um software malicioso chamado AMOS. O programa tem capacidade de coletar credenciais do iCloud, arquivos pessoais e informações de cartões de crédito.

O ataque começa quando a pessoa faz buscas por termos comuns como “limpar espaço no Mac” ou “como liberar armazenamento no macOS” no Google. O mecanismo de pesquisa então apresenta, no topo dos resultados, links patrocinados que direcionam para uma conversa pública com um modelo de inteligência artificial — seja o ChatGPT ou o Grok — que inclui o comando malicioso disfarçado de “solução segura”.

Leia mais:

Ilustração de malware
É importante estar muito atento para não ser enganado por esse tipo de golpe (Imagem: janews / Shutterstock.com)

Os responsáveis pela ameaça conseguiram colocar os links em destaque na busca do Google, deixando-os acima dos resultados orgânicos. Em tais interações públicas, os comandos para Terminal aparecem passo a passo, com linguagem aparentemente confiável, incentivando o usuário a acreditar que aquele procedimento é legítimo para manutenção do sistema.

A vítima, ao seguir as instruções e colar o comando sugerido no Terminal, acaba executando uma cadeia oculta de instruções que baixa e ativa silenciosamente o software de roubo de dados no dispositivo, sem alertas de segurança ou bloqueios pelo macOS.

malware
Embora o ataque use tecnologia moderna como IA para atrair vítimas, a prevenção ainda passa pelo senso crítico básico: evitar seguir instruções técnicas de fontes não verificadas e não inserir comandos no Terminal com base em conteúdos encontrados em busca paga ou respostas de chatbots sem validação.(Imagem: HAKINMHAN/iStock)

Implicações do ataque

Uma vez acionado, o malware instalado pode obter acesso a informações sensíveis armazenadas no sistema da vítima, incluindo credenciais de contas e detalhes financeiros. A técnica é especialmente perigosa porque explora a confiança que muitos usuários depositam em respostas de ferramentas de IA e em listings superiores dos mecanismos de busca.

O post Atenção, usuários de Mac! Novo golpe começa com uma simples busca no Google apareceu primeiro em Olhar Digital.




Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Warnings Mount in Congress Over Expanded US Wiretap Powers



Experts tell US lawmakers that a crucial spy program’s safeguards are failing, allowing intel agencies deeper, unconstrained access to Americans’ data.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Active Attacks Exploit Gladinet's Hard-Coded Keys for Unauthorized Access and Code Execution



Huntress is warning of a new actively exploited vulnerability in Gladinet's CentreStack and Triofox products stemming from the use of hard-coded cryptographic keys that have affected nine organizations so far.
"Threat actors can potentially abuse this as a way to access the web.config file, opening the door for deserialization and remote code execution," security researcher Bryan Masters said.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Chrome Targeted by Active In-the-Wild Exploit Tied to Undisclosed High-Severity Flaw



Google on Wednesday shipped security updates for its Chrome browser to address three security flaws, including one it said has come under active exploitation in the wild.
The vulnerability, rated high in severity, is being tracked under the Chromium issue tracker ID "466192044." Unlike other disclosures, Google has opted to keep information about the CVE identifier, the affected component, and


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

2 Men Linked to China’s Salt Typhoon Hacker Group Likely Trained in a Cisco ‘Academy’



The names of two partial owners of firms linked to the Salt Typhoon hacker group also appeared in records for a Cisco training program—years before the group targeted Cisco’s devices in a spy campaign.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

.NET SOAPwn Flaw Opens Door for File Writes and Remote Code Execution via Rogue WSDL



New research has uncovered exploitation primitives in the .NET Framework that could be leveraged against enterprise-grade applications to achieve remote code execution.
WatchTowr Labs, which has codenamed the "invalid cast vulnerability" SOAPwn, said the issue impacts Barracuda Service Center RMM, Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM), and Umbraco 8. But the number of affected vendors is likely to be


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Unpatched Gogs Zero-Day Exploited Across 700+ Instances Amid Active Attacks



A high-severity unpatched security vulnerability in Gogs has come under active exploitation, with more than 700 compromised instances accessible over the internet, according to new findings from Wiz.
The flaw, tracked as CVE-2025-8110 (CVSS score: 8.7), is a case of file overwrite in the file update API of the Go-based self-hosted Git service. A fix for the issue is said to be currently in the


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

WIRTE Leverages AshenLoader Sideloading to Install the AshTag Espionage Backdoor



An advanced persistent threat (APT) known as WIRTE has been attributed to attacks targeting government and diplomatic entities across the Middle East with a previously undocumented malware suite dubbed AshTag since 2020.
Palo Alto Networks is tracking the activity cluster under the name Ashen Lepus. Artifacts uploaded to the VirusTotal platform show that the threat actor has trained its sights


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Trump’s Interest in Warner Bros. Deal Weighs On Justice Department



President Trump’s unusual decision to involve himself in the government’s review of the deal puts pressure on his antitrust chief.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

How Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Became a Gaming Tour de Force

Without a blockbuster budget or much experience, the creators of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 astounded the industry with an emotional narrative and old-school design.


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Hatching the Automobile’s Future in a Cloistered Los Angeles Lab



Desperate to catch up with Chinese automakers, Ford is redesigning its fleet with a Silicon Valley-style team. Is it too late?


Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Um e-mail basta para IA do Comet apagar todo o seu Google Drive, alerta pesquisa

Pesquisadores da Straiker STAR Labs descobriram um ataque de clique zero (sem necessidade de clique) capaz de transformar o navegador Comet, da Perplexity AI, numa ferramenta involuntária de destruição. Basta um único e-mail malicioso para que os arquivos do Google Drive de um usuário sejam apagados. 

Neste tipo de ataque, o usuário não precisa clicar em nada para que ele ocorra. No ataque em questão, o próprio assistente de inteligência artificial (IA) faz o serviço sujo ao interpretar a mensagem como parte de uma rotina comum de organização.

A brecha explora exatamente o que torna esses navegadores de IA tão convenientes: a conexão profunda com plataformas muito usadas no cotidiano, como Gmail e Drive do Google. Geralmente, usuários dão ao Comet permissões para ler e-mails, navegar por pastas e até mover, renomear ou excluir arquivos. 

Esse grau de autonomia, somado a instruções ambíguas, cria o terreno perfeito para que um e-mail aparentemente inofensivo seja executado como se fosse um comando legítimo. É essa combinação que motivou o alerta dos pesquisadores.

Como um e-mail pode virar comando para apagar um Drive inteiro no Comet

O ataque nasce da própria integração do Comet com os serviços do Google. Como o navegador tem autorização para acessar o Gmail e manipular arquivos no Drive, ele age como um organizador automático sempre que o usuário pede que “verifique a caixa de entrada” ou “cuide das tarefas”. 

Tela para baixar o navegador Comet da Perplexity
Ataque explora o que torna navegadores de IA convenientes – combinação de acesso a plataformas muito usadas no cotidiano e comandos vagos (Imagem: agustin.photo/Shutterstock)

Essas instruções genéricas abrem espaço para interpretações amplas. E é justamente aí que a exploração acontece. O caminho é assim:

  • O cibercriminoso envia um e-mail especialmente preparado, escrito em linguagem natural e com aparência rotineira;
  • Para o Comet, aquilo parece apenas mais uma tarefa de organização. O agente lê a mensagem, entende as instruções como parte do trabalho solicitado e começa a mover e excluir arquivos sem pedir confirmação;
  • Não há estranheza no processo – tudo parece se encaixar no fluxo que o próprio usuário iniciou.

Por isso, o ataque é classificado como zero-click. A vítima não precisa abrir o e-mail malicioso. Basta acionar qualquer tarefa de organização para o Comet ler automaticamente a mensagem e executar as instruções. O navegador simplesmente cumpre o que acredita ser uma limpeza legítima do Drive.

Por que a falha se espalha rápido – e o que ela revela sobre agentes de IA

Quando o Comet recebe acesso via OAuth, ele não só gerencia o Drive do usuário. O navegador também consegue alterar conteúdo em pastas compartilhadas. 

Ilustração de e-mail deletando um drive de arquivos num computador
Um e-mail malicioso pode transformar assistente de IA de navegador numa ferramenta involuntária de destruição de arquivos, segundo pesquisa (Imagem: Pedro Spadoni via ChatGPT/Olhar Digital)

Isso significa que um ataque bem-sucedido pode se espalhar entre diferentes contas. Assim, é capaz de afetar equipes inteiras com a mesma rapidez com que um arquivo é movido ou apagado.

A parte mais preocupante: o golpe não depende de jailbreak nem de prompt injection, técnicas normalmente associadas à manipulação de IA. 

O ataque funciona explorando apenas o comportamento normal do navegador. De um lado, isso torna tudo mais difícil de detectar. De outro, torna tudo mais simples para quem tenta explorá-lo.

Leia mais:

Para os pesquisadores da Straiker STAR Labs, o caso é um exemplo claro do risco da chamada agência excessiva: quando agentes de IA tomam decisões amplas com base em instruções vagas, sem avaliar se cada passo é realmente seguro. 

Isso não é um bug isolado, mas um problema de arquitetura mesmo. Não basta reforçar a segurança do modelo; é preciso repensar o desenho completo dos agentes, suas permissões e a forma como interpretam linguagem natural.

O post Um e-mail basta para IA do Comet apagar todo o seu Google Drive, alerta pesquisa apareceu primeiro em Olhar Digital.




Fonte: Leia a matéria original

Hackers Exploit Critical Xen Orchestra Auth Bypass Flaw to Gain Admin Access

Hackers Exploit Critical Xen Orchestra Auth Bypass Flaw to Gain Admin Access Por Redação Security Technology • Nicho: cybersecurity, informa...